Abstract:  The theme of my paper is “Acceptance of Pluralism in Islam, A Myth 
or Truth”. Today, Islam appears to many a very rigid religion. But 
Islam even 1400 years back emphasized pluralism and toleration. Respect 
for Abrahamic Religions was a reality that Islam addressed from its 
very beginning. Quranic respect for Christians and Jews are shown in 
the notion of “people of the book”.  This paper focuses the 
significance, aims, areas and bases of relationship between Muslims 
and Christians. It also covers effects of events in relationship on 
both which have  taken place from time to time in the world, and 
reservations by certain Islamic Scholars who quote the Holy Quran and 
say Christians cannot be friends of Muslims and verses related to good 
relationships with them are abrogated (Mansookh).  Therefore, talks 
and any kind of cooperation with them are baseless. At present some 
efforts have been made towards constructive and meaningful relationship 
by prominent people from Christians and Muslims, both feel that this 
way of dialoguing with each other will remove misconceptions between 
Islam and Christianity and better relationships can be developed between 
the two largest communities which are widely scattered in the world 
today.  
Need and 
importance of dialogue among Abrahamic Traditions in the world today:  The media is full of news items of violence, intolerance, hatred and 
wars all over the world. Three religious communities which are deeply 
into it are those of Islam, Judaism and Christianity due to misunderstandings 
and intoleration. The clash has become the clash of civilizations – 
Islamic civilizations versus other civilizations. Today more than ever 
we need understanding of each other via constructive dialogue because 
the fact is that which is presented and accepted by researches that 
“Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all are known as models of “ethical 
monotheism.” (1) Murad Hofmann (1993) says: “It is an entirely different 
question whether the Islamo-Christian dialogue, in case of success, 
would be relevant. This is a fully justified question because de-Christianization, 
especially in Europe, has progressed to such a point that both Muslims 
and Christians now seem to be minorities, sharing the same boat in an 
ocean of materialism, agnosticism, and atheism. This is a word which 
lacks any antenna for dialoguing with people of religion” (2)  
 The dialogue 
will try to resolve the clash of the two civilizations or putting it 
simply the clash between two religions, Islam and Christianity. The 
presence of great number of Muslims in the West today cannot be ignored 
by the people and governments of Europe and America. If the presence 
of Muslims is not accepted gracefully, it might continue to threaten 
the West by terrorism. Examples can be found in plenty all over the 
world- Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan and now even in India, Pakistan 
and Indonesia. The viewing of Muslims as fanatics might turn the western 
world into a battle ground. The dialogue between Muslims and Christians 
might bring them on a platform where religious ethics and moralities 
can be included in a modern, secular framework. The dialogue is also 
significant in the light of human rights as advocated by the United 
Nations. The United Nations can enforce international order through 
peaceful and positive dialogue. 
Muslim and Christian dialogue in Islamic Shariah/Law: The primary sources of Islamic Law are the Holy Quran, which approves the pluralistic approaches and utmost tolerance at all levels in life with all human beings and the Sunnah (Muhammad’s (PBUH) deeds as a normative model). The life of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is a classic example of cooperation, reconciliation, tolerance, acceptance of pluralism, love of humanity and upholding human equality- irrespective of caste, creed and of color. Analogical reasoning and the consensus of the community should be taken in the light of Quran and Sunnah, and any judgment, decision and juristic opinion which is contradictory with the Quran and Sunnah should not be accepted in regard to Muslim and Christian relationship.
Christian – Muslim dialogue in the Quranic Perspective
According to Huston Smith (1995) “With a few striking exceptions that will be noted, the basic theological concepts of Islam are virtually identical with those of Judaism and Christianity, its forerunners. We shall confine our attention in this section to four that are the most important: God, Creation, the Human Self, and the Day of Judgment.” (3) Similarly the teaching of the Holy Quran proves the pluralistic approach and utmost tolerance in Islam at all levels in life with Christians and Jews.
i) Pluralism /Plurality of Faiths in the Holy Quran: A major issue facing the Muslims today is that of pluralism. Islam is part of the Abrahamic tradition which means that Islam is built on the same foundations as Judaism and Christianity. All Muslims believe and are taught to respect and love all prophets who were sent with the same message of Islam i.e. Kindness, love, charity and toleration. A person cannot be a Muslim without believing in the virgin birth and miracles of Jesus Christ. “Jesus” is mentioned by name in twenty five places in the Holy Quran.
ii) Respect 
for Abrahamic Religions: Allah says in the Quran (3:64): “Say: 
‘People of the Book’! Come to common terms which are between us.”  To 
show respect for Abrahamic religions, Muslims are required to find true 
common grounds and also to show their kindness, sincerity, truth and 
goodness for others.  Esposito (2005) says: “Islam has a long 
intertwined relationship with Judaism. Quranic respect for Jews and 
Judaism is shown in the notion of “people of the book,” inspired 
by the Jews and their tradition”. (4)  
iii)  
Rejection of Coercion in the Quran:  Allah says in the Holy Quran (2:256) 
“There shall be no coercion in the matter of faith” The Qur’an 
prescribes religious tolerance by clearly and emphatically stating that 
there should be no compulsion in religion.  
iv) 
Recommendation for reconciliation:  Allah says in the Holy Quran (4:128): “Reconciliation is the best”. 
It means that peace and reconciliation should be established at all 
levels. 
v)  
Freedom for religion and co-existence in the Quran:  The Holy Quran (109:6) says, O Prophet (PBUH), tell the people “To 
you then be your way, to me mine.”  This needs to be adopted worldwide 
as a slogan. 
vi) Religion 
is a person’s own concern: Belief in this or that religion is 
a person’s own concern. That is why the Holy Quran (18:29) says: “This 
is the truth from your lord so let him who wishes believe and let him 
who wishes disbelieve”  
vii) Recognition 
of diversity of culture:   Allah says in the Holy Quran (49: 13): “Verily we created you from 
a single pair, male and female, and made you into Nations and tribes, 
so that you may know each other” This implies that Islam recognizes 
diversity of culture and capabilities. Mutual understanding in all forms 
of human activities is clearly mentioned in this verse. 
viii) 
Recognition of diversity of languages: Promoting the learning of different 
languages is allowed by Islam. Holy Qur'an (30: 22) says: “And of 
His signs are the creation of the heavens and the earth and the diversity 
of your tongues and your complexions.” Zaid bin Thabit (RA), by the order of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) learnt 
Hebrew and did correspondence in this language. (5). It teaches us to 
learn somatic languages so that effective communication can take place 
among Abrahamic faiths.  
ix)Status of Jesus and Moses: In the Quran (2: 136), All Muslims are required to believe in Jesus (PBUH) and Moses (PBUH). We read in Quran “Say O Muslims: We believe in Allah/God, and the revelation given to us, and to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and that given to Moses and Jesus, and that given to (all) Prophets from their Lord: we make no distinction between any one of them: and we submit to Allah/God.”
x) Broad-minded 
attitude towards belief: Allah says in the Holy Quran (2: 62): “Those 
who believe, and those who are Jews, Christians, Sabeans, all those 
who believe in God and in the Day of Judgment and do the good works, 
all of them have their merit with their Lord. They have no reason to 
fear nor will they grieve.”  
xi) Dialogue with Christians and Jews in the most courteous manner: Quran gives ethical foundations of dialogue with the Christians and Jews. Allah says in the Holy Quran (29: 46): “And do not argue with the people of the Book (Christian & Jews) except in the best manner”.
Christian – Muslim dialogue and relationship from the life of the Prophet (PBUH)
The Life of Prophet (PBUH) 
is a classic example of tolerance, pluralism, love, humanity and upholding 
human equality- irrespective of caste, creed or color.  
Examples 
of social relationship and dialogue before the declaration of Prophethood: 
i)At the age of twelve met 
a Christian monk: His Uncle Abu Talib who, as soon as he was old 
enough, took him on the caravan journey to Syria so that he could learn 
the trade, according to legend, a fateful meeting with a Christian monk, 
who recognized in him one of God’s chosen.(6) 
ii) At the 
age 35 re-construction of Kaba: In the year 605 AD the governing 
council of Quraysh, the mala, decided that the Kaba should be rebuilt. 
Although this temple of Abraham is, in essence, timeless, its earthly 
form-being perishable-has been reconstructed a number of times. In that 
year a Byzantine ship had been wrecked on the coast, providing excellent 
timber for the purpose, and there was a Christian carpenter living in 
Mecca who was competent to erect the scaffolding. The main work of construction 
was divided between the clans, but when it was done, disagreement arose 
as to who should have the honour of replacing the sacred Black Stone 
in its niche. It was decided that the first man to enter the square 
by a particular gate should be asked to act as arbitrator, and the first 
comer was Muhammad. He told the people to bring a large cloak, placed 
the stone on it and called upon representatives of each of the clans 
to join together in raising it into position; he himself then fixed 
the stone in its niche.(7) 
iii) 
Khadija took him to Waraqah – a Christian:  In 610 AD Jibrail descended to the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) with first 
revelation. He hastened home and called to Khadija: Cover me. Cover 
me. She laid him down, placing a cloak over him, and as soon as he had 
recovered himself a little he told her what had happened. When she had 
settled him and he had fallen into a deep sleep, she consulted  her 
cousin Waraqa bin Nawfal, well versed of Old & New Testament. After 
listening to her account of her husband’s experience, Waraqa told 
her: ‘By Him in whose hand is the soul of Waraqa, if what you say 
is true there has come to Muhammad the great Namus, even he who came 
to Moses. Truly Muhammad is the Prophet of this people. Calm your husband’s 
fears and banish your own. (8) 
Examples 
of social relationship and dialogue after declaration of Prophethood: 
i) Attitude 
of total acceptance towards all: The Arabian Peninsula during the 
time of the Prophet (PBUH) was a region in which various faiths were 
present.  There were Christians, Jews, Zoroastrians, polytheists, and 
others not affiliated with any religion.   
The Prophet (PBUH) who founded the classless and universal society of 
Islam actually brought various nations together and removed their tribal 
prejudices. 
ii) 
Supportive behavior of a Christian Slave in Taif: 619 AD the Prophet 
Muhammad (PBUH) was stoned by the people of Ta’if. When he was driven 
out of Ta’if, it was the Christian slave ‘Addas who went out to 
Muhammad, brought him a bunch of grapes, kissed him, and embraced him.(9) 
iii) Courteous 
treatment towards Christian delegation of Najran: Once the Prophet 
received a delegation of sixty Christians in Madinah from the region 
of Najran, then a part of Yemen, at his mosque. As the prayer time came, 
they had no place of their own to worship so he invited them to offer 
their prayers at Masjid-e-Nabwi., they faced towards the east and prayed (10) This was a great example of tolerance for all religion. The most significant 
charter of tolerance was granted by the prophet of Islam to Christians. 
iv) Practice of excellent treatment towards non-Muslim neighbors: Great importance is attached to neighbors (whatever their religion) and to treat them nicely and to send them food items. Jibrael (A.S) emphasized good behavior towards neighbors so much so that the Prophet (PBUH) thought they would be heirs in the legacy. A Jew lived in the neighborhood of Abdullah bin Umar (RA). Once he slaughtered a goat and asked his family members if they had sent some meat to their Jew neighbors. He added that the Prophet (PBUH) observed, “Jibrail (A.S) advised me to have good behavior towards the neighbors so much so that I thought that they would be included among the heirs for sharing the legacy.” (11)
v) A warning 
to Muslims who misbehave with people of other faiths. 
The Prophet (PBUH) said: “Beware!  Whoever is cruel and hard 
on non-Muslim minority, or curtails his rights, or burdens them with 
more than they can bear, or takes anything from them against their free 
will; I (Prophet Muhammad) will complain against that person on the 
Day of Judgment.” (12)That’s why the second Caliph of Islam Umar (RA) 
just before his death emphasized that “I entreat the succeeding Caliph 
to show excellent treatment towards Zimmis (non-Muslim citizens of an 
Islamic State)” (13) 
vi) Equal 
Punishment to criminals: A Muslim killed a Christian or Jew. When 
this case was brought up before the Prophet PBUH) he said, “I have 
more responsibility to fulfill towards people who come under my jurisdiction.” 
Therefore, the Prophet (PBUH) sentenced the Muslim to death for the 
killing of a Jew or Christian.(14) He upheld the principle of blood 
for blood or life for life. The criminal whether Muslim, Christian or 
Jew has to be punished.  
Examples 
of Political, legal dialogue and relations: 
There are also examples in the life of the Prophet in which he cooperated among people of other faiths in the political arena as well.
i) Alliance 
with a Christian King in Abyssinia (Ethiopia): 
The Hijrah to Ethiopia (615 A.D) is also an example of his political 
skill in seeking alliances with others. When the persecution increased 
in Makkah and some of his followers found it difficult to live in that 
environment, he allowed them to migrate to Ethiopia and seek the help 
of the Christian King there. The emigrants were well received in Abyssinia 
and were allowed complete freedom of worship.  (15) 
ii) 
Formation of a multicultural society and treaty with Jews 
: This Treaty was a good example of 
peaceful coexistence of Muslims, Jews, Christians and polytheists in 
Madina. The important step Muhammad (PBUH) took on arriving in Madinah 
was to conclude a treaty with the neighboring Jewish tribes for mutual 
help and defence of the city. The Charter of Madina was framed by the 
Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) himself and was called the first Constitution 
of Islam in the Islamic State of Madina. According to this Constitution 
the Muslims and non Muslims (Zimmis) were given equal rights of safety 
and protection. Even the political terminology used is the same for 
both Muslims and non-Muslims. (16) Esposito (2009) says: “Religiously, 
Islam proved a more tolerant religion, providing greater religious freedom 
for Jews and indigenous Christians” (17) 
iii) Correspondence 
with great emperors: In his letters the Prophet (PBUH) interacted 
on an intercultural level, after 6th Hijra, he wrote letters to some 
rulers in the East & West inviting them to the faith of Islam. He 
sent emissaries to the Roman Emperor, the Persian Emperor, the ruler 
of Egypt, the King of Abyssinia, the Chief of Syria inviting them to 
Islam.  
iv) Tolerance 
on the Conquest of Makkah: On the occasion of the Conquest of Makkah 
the prophet (PBUH) entered Makkah with a force of ten to twelve thousand 
followers. There were many Makkans whom he (PBUH) could have justly 
taken revenge from on that day but he showed magnanimity, even to his 
worst enemies, by declaring General Amnesty. History has no record of 
such tolerant and magnanimous behavior. Armstrong (2006) said while 
analyzing the conquest of Makkah: “He (Muhammad PBUH) had no desire 
for bloody reprisal .Nobody was made to accept Islam nor do they seem 
to have felt any pressure to do so. Reconciliation was still Muhammad’s 
objective”. (18) 
v) Declaration 
of pluralism in the Last Sermon of the Holy Prophet (PBUH): Islam 
considers the people of the world as one nation and equal to each other 
in every respect.  Says in the Holy Quran (2: 213) “And all people 
are but a single nation.” The Prophet (PBUH) declared about equal 
political and legal status for non Muslim on the occasion of the last 
Sermon in 10th Hijra (632 
AD) and said: "Your 
Lord is one and all human beings are Adam’s children. An Arab is no 
better than a non-Arab. In return, a non-Arab is no better than an Arab. 
A red faced man is not better than a black faced one except in piety 
and Adam was created out of clay."  
The aims 
of dialogue 
The aims of 
dialogue might be different for organizations and individuals. The Cartigny 
Consultation (1969) held in Switzerland presented three aims of dialogue: 
Islam is a 
religion of Dawah or invitation, the aim of Islam should cross economic, 
social and political interests. The aim of dialogue must be knowing, 
learning, reaching, talking, discussing and persuading each other. 
 
The role 
of events and resulting apprehensions 
Historical 
events have led to false perceptions by both Christians and Muslims 
towards each other. Muslims remember the events in history when they 
suffered at the hands of Christian rulers for example by crusades, commerce, 
conquests and colonization and Christians view Islam as a backward and 
aggressive religion when they view the conditions of women and the strict 
laws of punishment in some Islamic countries, tragedy of 9/11, 7/7 and 
other violent acts in the Muslim and non- Muslim territories. Therefore 
there are many apprehensions. 
 Some 
Islamic scholars quote the Holy Quran and say that Christians cannot 
be friends of Muslims. Therefore talks are baseless and religious cooperation 
to solve global problems facing humanity is never encouraged by them.  
Another apprehension is the intellectual, economic and political domination 
of the west. Muslims think that any dialogue is an extension of that 
domination. Finally the Muslims are asked to forget the past and let 
bygones be bygones. But they find it very painful, for Muslims many 
lessons are learned from history (like the stories of the Quran) and 
so they want to link the present with the past.   
The areas 
of dialogue 
Esposito & 
Mogahed (2007) conducted a Gallup survey, based on Gallup’s World 
poll –  “What can the West do to improve relations with the Muslim 
world?” The most frequent response they received from moderates and 
radicals was: “more respect, consideration, and understanding of Islam 
as a religion; not underestimating the status of Arab/Muslim countries; 
being fair and less prejudiced.” (19). I highly recommend that the 
same criteria be applied to Muslim treatment towards other religions. 
Humanity is 
faced with extinction if it does not solve problems such as global warming, 
de-forestation, unjust distribution of resources and so on. People who 
are sensitive to these issues think that one area of Muslim- Christian 
dialogue should be the common problems being faced by all people of 
the world, not just Christians, Jews and Muslims. Issues such as poverty, 
hunger, oppression and human- rights are common to millions and billions 
of people in the world. This area of dialogue is very important as it 
can lead to the elimination of serious problems by coordinated and concerted 
efforts. Another area of dialogue should be the role of Islamic Shariah/ 
Law towards minorities in an Islamic State and the role of the constitution 
towards Muslims in a non- Islamic State. This issue has to be debated, 
discussed and resolved amicably. 
There are so 
many parallel concepts in the Quran and Bible. Muslims and Christians 
can work together, using their common principles which will give them 
strength to combat intolerance, fanaticism from their lives and society 
and bring about an atmosphere of warmth, love, morality and faith to 
all ages especially the youth of today.    
Bases of 
dialogue 
As far as Islam 
is concerned there is no force or compulsion in religion. Furthermore 
all religions have to be respected. Unfortunately, scholars of certain 
schools of thought have considered verses which talk about pluralism 
towards other faiths as abrogated and have pointed it out in foot notes 
in the Quran. 
Case of 
abrogation in the Holy Quran: Early Islamic scholars like Abu Bakr 
Jassas (d. 370 Hijra), Imam Jalal al Din Suyuti (d. 911Hijra), Shah 
Wali Allah (d.1177 Hijra ) agreed that injunctions related to certain 
Quranic Verses stand abrogated; although they differ in the number of 
the abrogated Verses.  
Some scholars 
consciously or unconsciously misinterpret the verses related to friendship 
and cooperation between Muslims and the people of the book (Jews & 
Christians) and rewards by Allah on their good deeds in such a way that 
positive and creative dialogue with them was affected badly. Perhaps 
this misinterpretation resulted due to fast political changes in the 
world. During the last one hundred years it seems that Islam was used 
for political objectives and it was interpreted accordingly for example 
translation of Holy Quran states:  “Those who believe (in the 
Quran), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians 
and the Sabians – any who believe in Allah and the Last Day, and work 
righteousness, shall have their reward with their lord; on them shall 
be no fear, nor shall they grieve.”(2: 62, Translation by Yusuf Ali) 
Dr Muhammad 
Taqi-ud-Din Al-Al- Hilali and Dr Muhammad Muhsin Khan  from Saudi Arabia 
after translating the verse comment in the footnote: “This verse (& 
verse 5:69) mentioned in the Quran should not be misinterpreted by the 
reader as mentioned by Ibn Abbas (RA) (Tafsir Al- Tabari). That the 
provision of this verse was abrogated by the verse 3:85.” Dr Muhammad 
Taqi-ud-Din Al-Al- Hilali and Dr Muhammad Muhsin have quoted from Tafseer 
al Tabari by Ibn-e- Jarer Tabari (d 310 Hijra) a saying of Ibn Abbas 
(R A) that this verse 62 of Chapter 2 is abrogated.  
Another great 
scholar of Islam, Muhammad Asad, who converted to Islam from Judaism 
also comments in the footnote of the same verse (2:  62) “---the idea 
of “salvation” is here made conditional upon three elements only: 
belief in God, belief in the Day of Judgment, and righteous action in 
life---.”  
When we study 
in detail the part of the Tafsir Al-Tabari related to this verse, we 
find many more comments by different scholars including the one by Ibn-e-Abbas 
(R A). But Ibn-e-Jareer after mentioning different opinions concluded 
that Allah has not made conditional rewards on good deeds with Iman 
(Muslim faith).(20) It was the need of today’s turbulent situation 
that this conclusion of Ibn-e-Jareer should be highlighted which will 
create positive feeling rather than that interpretation which definitely 
has created and will create a lot of misunderstanding and conflict. 
Presently, 
some scholars have highlighted and repeatedly quoted these verses in 
which friendship between Muslims and the people of the book is prohibited 
and forbidden out of context for example Hud 11:113,Al Imran 3 :28, 
Al Mumtahina  60 :1, Al Mujadila 58 :22. They have tried to prove that 
therefore any relations leading to cooperation with non- Muslims is 
not allowed leading to misunderstanding and strife in today’s world. 
This attitude is against the true spirit of Islam.  In the commentary 
of verses of Al Mumtahina 8-9 an Egyptian scholar Muhammad Abdu writes 
in that the second Khalifa Umar (R A) and later Khalifas who came after 
him delegated official work to Romans (Christians). Even the Ummayad 
and Abbasid rulers did the same. They appointed Christians and Jews 
for their official work. Many ambassadors of the Ottoman Empire were 
Christians.(21)Another Egyptian Scholar Rashid Raza writes that the 
verses related to not having close friendship with Jews was only applicable 
to Jews of those time who acted against Islam and not to all Jews in 
general. Therefore, in those days, considering the situation, it was 
forbidden to seek help in certain matters where secrecy was required. 
Later on, times changed and Jews became supporters of Muslims. In the 
conquest of Spain the Jews were on the side of Muslims not Christians.  
Comparative 
analysis of the verses related to the prohibition of relationship with 
non- Muslims: Cooperation and good relationship not 
only with Christian and Jews but also all other non-Muslims is allowed 
and encouraged provided they are open and fair towards Islam and Muslims 
(22). All verses related to the prohibition of relationship, trust and 
cooperation with non-Muslims apply only if it is certain that they can 
bring damage to Islam and Muslims. If it is contrary to this, then taking 
help from them, having friendships and educational and scientific cooperation, 
delegating responsibilities, seeking guidance and providing and taking 
services is lawful and legal. There are common areas in both religions. 
Christians and Muslims can work together in those common areas which 
will promote understanding, harmony and goodwill. 
Peace and 
Dialogue initiative in the world today: 
This century 
hopefully will be called “The age of reconciliation and dialogue”. 
Efforts have been made from prominent figures from Muslim and Christian 
camps like John L. Esposito and Seyyed Hossein Nasr, M. Fathullah Gulen 
all around the world to resolve differences at micro and macro levels. 
In October 2007 an open letter of 38 Muslim scholars and call from Muslim 
Religious Leaders to His Holiness Pope Benedict xvi and Leaders of Christian 
Churches, everywhere, states: “Muslims and Christians together make 
up well over half of the world’s population. Without peace and justice 
between these two religious communities, there can be no meaningful 
peace in the world. The future of the world depends on peace between 
Muslims and Christians. The basis for this peace and understanding already 
exists. It is part of the very foundational principles of both faiths: 
love of the One God, and love of the neighbour. These principles are 
found over and over again in the sacred texts of Islam and Christianity. 
The Unity of God, the necessity of love for Him, and the necessity of 
love of the neighbour is thus the common ground between Islam and Christianity”.  
When this report was launched initially 138 leading Islamic Scholars 
from all over the world became signatories. Later on 161 more prominent 
Muslim figures endorsed the publication. A total of 299 great Islamic 
scholars agreed to the ideas presented in this letter.  
A very positive 
response was given by famous Christian theologians from all over the 
world such as Professor David Ford, Director, Cambridge Inter-Faith 
Programme, Dr Rowan Williams, The Archbishop of Canterbury, Rev. Dr 
Samuel Kobia, General Secretary, World council of Churches, The World 
Alliance of Reformed Churches (WARC), The Baptist World Alliance, Mennonite 
Church USA. Over 300 leading Christian scholars from Yale gave a very 
positive response when “A common World” was published as a full 
page advertisement in the” New York Times”. (23) 
King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud of Saudi Arabia, called on a “dialogue” among 57 Muslim heads of States in Makkah, four years ago. In November 2008, Senior Vatican and Islamic Scholars had a dialogue to improve relationships between the world’s largest faiths. Pope Benedict xvi addressed the participants in the first Seminar of the Catholic-Muslim forum on Nov 6’ 2008 for greater understanding between Muslims and Christians. U.S. President Obama has started seriously talking about a dialogue between the two faiths keeping in mind all the aspects that can lead to reconciliation. As a Democratic presidential candidate Obama said in his speech in Berlin on August 24, 2008. “Tear down the wall of racism”. He spoke about breaking down the walls (like the literal Berlin wall of the past) between peoples of different religions. U.S. President Obama said in Cairo, Egypt, on 4th June, 2009. “Islam is a part of Europe and there is a mosque in every state of our Union” The question arises why inspite of so much effort for global harmony is going on, why the gulf between the Muslim and the Western world continues to grow still.
Conclusion: The Sources of Islamic Law/Shariah, the Holy Quran, Sunnah/Hadith, Ijma (consensus of community), Qiyas (analogy) approve the pluralistic values, dialogue and reconciliation at levels in life with all human beings. “Almost all “experts,” for various reasons, agree that humanity has reached a critical juncture: the current confrontation between Muslim society and the West. On both sides, there are those who believe that the future salvation or ruin of humanity may hang in the balance.” (24) We cannot make a new earth and sky; we have to live together on the same earth and under the same sky, so we must come together to save the planet. Islam respects diversity. All the three (Moses (PBUH), Jesus (PBUH), Muhammad (PBUH) great Prophets from the desert(25) commanded people to do what is just and forbade them to do what is evil. Dialogue is the best way to communicate with the people instead of the language of the weapon or sword. In the life of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) from 571AD to 632 AD we find many examples of courteous behavior and exemplary relationship and peaceful coexistence with the Christians. Islamic teachings show that each human being, either Muslim or non-Muslim, is valuable.
References 
1. Corrigan, John. Denny, Frederick M. Eire, Carlos M. N. Jaffee, Martin S. (1998). Jews, Christians, Muslims: A comparative Introduction to Monotheistic Religions. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, p. xiv.
2. Hofmann, Murad. (1993). Islam: The Alternative. Maryland: Amana Publications. P 28
3. Smith, Huston. (1995). The Illustrated World’s Religions: A guide to our wisdom traditions. San Francisco: Harper Collins Publishers, p 157.
4. Esposito John L. (2005). The Oxford Dictionary of Islam. Karachi: Oxford University Press, p 161,
5. Muhammad bin Eisa Al-Tirmidi. (1999). Jani Al-Tirmidi. Riyad: Darussalam. Hadith no. 2715 p. 615
6. Gai Eaton. (1997). Islam and the Destiny of Man. Lahore: Suhail Academy p101
7. Ibid p. 102
8. Al Damishqi Ibn-e-Kaseer (2003). Albidaya wa Alnihaya Bairut: Dar Al-Kotob Al- Ilmiyah Vol.1 p. 319
9. Al- Qustalani, Ahmad bin Muhammad (2001). Al-Mwahib al Ladunniyah. Gujrat (India) Markaz Ahlussunnat Barakat Raza Vol. 1, pp 268-269
10. Ibn- Ishaq, (2004). The Life of Muhammad, tr. Guillaume A. A deputation from the Christians of Najran, Karachi: Oxford University Press, p 271.
11. Abu Dawud, Sulaiman bin Ashas. (2007). Sunan -e- Abi Dawud. Bab no.134, Hadith No 5151, Riyad: Maktaba al Maarif p 931.
12. Ibid Bab no. 33, Hadith No 3052, Riyad: Maktaba al Maarif p 548.
13. Abu Yousuf, Yaqoob bin Ibrahim.(1979).Kitab al- Khiraj. Beirut: Darul Marifa p. 125.
14. Al- Qarshi, Yahya bin Adam.(1979). Kitab al- Khiraj. Beirut: Darul Marifa p. 76.
15. Martin Lings.(1994). Muhammad.Lahore: Suhail Academy. P. 80
16. Hamidullah, Muhammad. (NG). Muhammad Rasulullah. Lahore: Idara –e-Islamiyat pp 103- 109.
17. Esposito John L. (2009). The Islamic Threat, Myth or Reality. New York: Oxford University Press. p 39.
18. Armstrong, Karen. (2006). Muhammad, Prophet of our time. London, Harper Press P 200.
19. Esposito John L & Dalia Mogahed. (2007). Who speaks for Islam? New York: Gallup Press, p 91.
20. Al- Tabari, Muhammad bin Jareer. (1988). Jami-al-Bayan An Taweel-e-Ayatul Quran Beirut: Daral Fikr. Vol. 1, p 324.
21. Muhammad Abdu (NG) Tafseer Al- Manar Beirut: Darul Marifa Vol.4 pp. 82-84
22. Ibid
23. A Common Word between Us and You. (2009). Jordan: The Royal Aal Al- Bayt, Institute for Islamic Though.
24. Lang, Jeffrey. (2008). Struggling to Surrender. Maryland: Amana Publications, p203
25. Muhammad Asad.(1985). The Road to Makkah. Gibraltar: Dar Al-Andalus. P. 145.